The stuff between
By Garrett,
Simply put, your service business in its most raw form look something like this:
- Stuff → Lead;
- Lead → stuff → Signed contract;
- Signed contract → stuff → Start;
- Start → stuff → Complete;
- Complete → stuff → Aftercare.
And there’s a level of automation and organization and reporting to figure out in the ‘stuff zones’ until there’s nothing left to call stuff.
You see, it’s the stuff zones that make your company your company and where you become more memorable, scalable, profitable, sellable, etc.
Finding the opportunities
Let’s consider a simple exercise where we choose one of the low hanging fruits tasks between Signed contract and Start and what we can do with it.
We pull out our handy stopwatch and time the task that we are focusing on and realize that it takes 10 minutes on average per.
Then we confirm that we do this task 500 times per year.
Basic rounded math says that: 500 occurrences * 10 minutes = 5,000 minutes / 60 minutes = 80 hours * our $200 hourly rate = $16,000 per year spent on this particular task (and that does not include context switching or other abstract costs).
We automate the task.
The compounding effect
Assuming our business either stays the same size forever or grows, we save a minimum of $16,000 per year or 80 hours per year (plus the abstract savings), however you want to look at it.
When you automate the right things, you free up capacity for higher-value work. This is a key profit lever (reducing operating expenses while maintaining and improving quality).
What should we do with all of this extra time and/or money to make our business better?
Perhaps roll it into doing this same exercise for another task. Snowball!
And so on.
Oh, and did I mention that there’s also a bunch of customer experiences to be improved in the stuff zones?
Process, experience, process, experience, etc. for everything until there’s nothing else categorized as stuff and your business is exponentially better than it was before. Somewhere I heard (or read) that the gift of solving a problem is that you get a new problem to solve. That’s the magic bullet (but it’s definitely not magic and it’s much slower than a bullet).
Want help identifying and optimizing your stuff zones? Let’s chat about where your business is losing time and money.
Like this? Get email updates or grab the RSS feed like it’s 2008.
More from the blog
-
The state and the machine
> What little we saw of Fable and Mythos offers both cause for excitement and concern. It was widely and credibly seen as a model of a completely different caliber from those that had come before. Perhaps the risks in this instance were overstated or amplified for political ends. What is more profound is that the short time we had with the models offered a clear glimpse of a future in which a single company is making significant progress toward a superintelligence with the potential to rival or exceed the power of nation-states or even massive corporations. That juncture was never going to ar…
-
We have ways of making you pay
> The true cost of AI work is hard to measure; the value of AI work is also hard to measure, and metering changes which of those two blindnesses you notice first. It drags the cost into the light, itemised and arriving monthly, while the value stays diffuse, lagging and easy to argue about. That asymmetry is exactly why the panic is showing up now, ahead of any definitive verdict on whether the spending was worth it.Simon Willison did the arithmetic on himself. He pays $200 a month across his Anthropic and OpenAI consumer plans, and when he ran the [ccusage](https://github.com/ryoppippi/ccusa…
-
Bloated: how chat made you fat
> It helps to remember the time you save generating a document is not free. It is borrowed from every person who has to read it, at interest, and the longer the distribution list the worse the rate of return.The pitch for writing with a language model is that it saves you time: you describe the memo, the model produces it and 90 seconds later you have four pages (okay, maybe forty) instead of a blank document. Someone still has to read those pages though. The model did not remove that work. It just moved it downstream to your colleagues or suppliers, and on the way it produced more than any h…
-
Apple’s bicycle without a chain
Steve Jobs described the computer as a bicycle for the mind. Apple Intelligence so far is more like a bicycle with no chain. The frame is gorgeous, and the engineering is extraordinary, but you cannot get far with it.In early 2025, Xe Iaso published a [piece that landed like a brick through a window](https://xeiaso.net/blog/2025/squandered-holy-grail/) in the Apple developer community. The argument was simple and damning: Apple had built the holy grail of trusted compute with Private Cloud Compute, a genuinely unprecedented piece of security infrastructure, only to fill it with half-baked not…
-
Weeknotes vol. 17: business, schmizness
Hello and happy casual weeknotes Friday.I stopped writing these [about a year ago](/blog/weeknotes-16/) when I began the transition into consulting (solving fun and challenging problems), and to say a lot has changed since then would be the understatement of the century.In summary: [Iain](/blog/iain/) joined full time, we're helping people solve operational problems and optimize their work across pretty much all aspects of business, and we're having a lot of fun doing it. Iain has his masters in AI for Business, which has pushed me to go down the biggest rabbit hole I've been down since HTML/…
