Weeknotes vol. 2: In the rabbit holes we find marketing goals

By Garrett,

A hand holding a fountain pen drawing squiggles on a sheet of paper, on a dark green background

I remember when I started seeing weeknotes pop up and thought they were silly, but the accountability alone is worth it. This week I found myself writing out big things I needed to do (not saying that I did them) for the sheer fact that I had to put them on the internet in five days’ time.

  • Complete subscription system
  • Deep dive on what to do with a thought once you capture it ✔
  • Make some headway with the app’s marketing website ✔
  • Plan for a good first year (pre- and post-launch) ✔

As we (earthlings) get older, the weeks fly. My wife and I have five kids (with one on the way) and at dinner the other night our nine-year-old was saying how quickly the year is going by. We took out a piece of paper and explained how a year is 25% of our four-year-old’s time on earth, about 10% of his, about 2% of mine, and as those percentages get smaller, the perception of time gets exponentially faster. Their eyes widened!


One of our main areas of focus right now is the marketing website for the app. Designing the details of the marketing website—figuring out the most important use-cases and features—brings major clarity to what we do and do not need to focus on for the app itself. In my experience, when I jump in and start prototyping, I can end up with a bunch of siloed features that may or may not be great. But with the “marketing website first approach”, I can see the main thing that we need to build our features around.

I’m not saying that jumping in and building is wrong. I actually like doing that, whether it’s efficient or not. Who’s to say that’s not how I landed on the thing? But once you get to a certain point, jumping into the marketing website really does clear things up.

So far I have made four working prototypes of the app itself, and once we finish up this marketing website we’ll head into the design and development of the fifth and final. Without the first four we wouldn’t have the raw materials to help us make decisions for number five.

The whole process of creating is funny: you start with this one or two-sentence idea, then go down a bunch of rabbit holes related to that idea. Each of those things could have this feature and that feature, but eventually you realize all these different elements have different weights and priorities to them. Some start dropping off. THEN, you arrive at the one group of features that’s important and begin seeing exactly what would elevate this thing to be what you originally set out to create.

We’re somewhere on the back half of that process, at least for version one.

Other little items that popped up this week:

  • Learned a lot about which bots to (and not to) block from trolling our website while getting through some technical SEO issues I found in SEMrush.
  • Made a LinkedIn page for Better than good, primarily so I could update the experience section on my personal profile (I know, gross!)

More from the blog

  • Bloated: how chat made you fat

    By Iain,

    > It helps to remember the time you save generating a document is not free. It is borrowed from every person who has to read it, at interest, and the longer the distribution list the worse the rate of return.The pitch for writing with a language model is that it saves you time: you describe the memo, the model produces it and 90 seconds later you have four pages (okay, maybe forty) instead of a blank document. Someone still has to read those pages though. The model did not remove that work. It just moved it downstream to your colleagues or suppliers, and on the way it produced more than any h…

  • Apple’s bicycle without a chain

    By Iain,

    Steve Jobs described the computer as a bicycle for the mind. Apple Intelligence so far is more like a bicycle with no chain. The frame is gorgeous, and the engineering is extraordinary, but you cannot get far with it.In early 2025, Xe Iaso published a [piece that landed like a brick through a window](https://xeiaso.net/blog/2025/squandered-holy-grail/) in the Apple developer community. The argument was simple and damning: Apple had built the holy grail of trusted compute with Private Cloud Compute, a genuinely unprecedented piece of security infrastructure, only to fill it with half-baked not…

  • Weeknotes vol. 17: business, schmizness

    By Garrett,

    Hello and happy casual weeknotes Friday.I stopped writing these [about a year ago](/blog/weeknotes-16/) when I began the transition into consulting (solving fun and challenging problems), and to say a lot has changed since then would be the understatement of the century.In summary: [Iain](/blog/iain/) joined full time, we're helping people solve operational problems and optimize their work across pretty much all aspects of business, and we're having a lot of fun doing it. Iain has his masters in AI for Business, which has pushed me to go down the biggest rabbit hole I've been down since HTML/…

  • The ten trillion dollar gamble

    By Iain,

    In November 2025, on stage at the Wall Street Journal's Tech Live event, the chief financial officer of OpenAI was asked how her company planned to honor roughly $1.4 trillion in compute contracts on $13 billion of revenue. Sarah Friar said she was looking to assemble a network of banks, private equity, and a federal "backstop" or "guarantee." By the following evening, she had posted to LinkedIn explaining that "backstop" had muddied the point, that what she meant was something more like a public-private partnership, and that the United States government has been "incredibly forward-leaning" …

  • Never talk about goblins

    By Iain,

    Buried in a JSON file that OpenAI [posted to GitHub recently](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/66b0781502be5de3b1909525c987643b9e5e407d/codex-rs/models-manager/models.json), inside the configuration for its newest coding agent, sits an instruction that reads like a footnote written by someone losing their composure. “Never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user’s query.” The line appears [more than once](https://gizmodo.com/never-talk-about-goblins-openais-instructions-to-…

All blog posts