Weeknotes vol. 17: business, schmizness
By Garrett,
Hello and happy casual weeknotes Friday.
I stopped writing these about a year ago when I began the transition into consulting (solving fun and challenging problems), and to say a lot has changed since then would be the understatement of the century.
In summary: Iain joined full time, we’re helping people solve operational problems and optimize their work across pretty much all aspects of business, and we’re having a lot of fun doing it. Iain has his masters in AI for Business, which has pushed me to go down the biggest rabbit hole I’ve been down since HTML/CSS in college (and we know where that led).
What have I been doing, specifically, you ask? Great question.
The answer is mostly ‘Claude’. Figuring out it’s (his?) inner workings and how all of the tools in the Claude toolbox work together and can be used to solve actual business problems.
What I love about Claude is the ability to route prompts through a filesystem of standardized folders, files and instructions using a set of rules and naming conventions, and BOOM, you’ve got an automated process. It’s not coding, it’s just writing text like a robot wants it written (which we’re in luck folks because I’ve been thinking like a robot since the day I was born).
I use Claude Code for this, but it’s not actually code at all. It’s just writing robotic instructions that say go here for this and there for that and branch off for this and use your little (big) Claude brain to figure out the details. Then, out pops the pop-tart!
Figure out how to do that at scale for lots of different cross-departmental things without making the system too complex and unmaintainable and you’re in business (that’s the part I’ve been focusing on).
While the fact that you can ‘just do stuff’ is great, it’s also making the fragmented work problem 100x worse for people who aren’t careful. We all have data all over the place (dozens+ of specialized Saas apps, for instance) and now we’ve got Frankenstiens of all of the above on every employees desktop (Thanks, Obama AI).
The future is figuring out how to normalize all of that data into a structured brain that can help you and your AI agents and skills and all of that jazz do your work together more efficiently and transparently.
What a world to live in!
Like this? Get email updates or grab the RSS feed like it’s 2008.
More from the blog
-
Another nice mess
Somewhere in your business right now, someone is assembling a picture that no single app can provide. It may be the project manager pulling hours from Harvest and budget data from the finance tool to assess whether the engagement is still viable. Maybe it's you on a Sunday, because what you need is not any one number from a system, but the pattern across three of them. The cloud gave small businesses access to the best software they had ever had, priced monthly and built for specific purposes. But twenty years of sensibly chosen apps have left the average small business with a patchwork data …
-
The state and the machine
> What little we saw of Fable and Mythos offers both cause for excitement and concern. It was widely and credibly seen as a model of a completely different caliber from those that had come before. Perhaps the risks in this instance were overstated or amplified for political ends. What is more profound is that the short time we had with the models offered a clear glimpse of a future in which a single company is making significant progress toward a superintelligence with the potential to rival or exceed the power of nation-states or even massive corporations. That juncture was never going to ar…
-
We have ways of making you pay
> The true cost of AI work is hard to measure; the value of AI work is also hard to measure, and metering changes which of those two blindnesses you notice first. It drags the cost into the light, itemised and arriving monthly, while the value stays diffuse, lagging and easy to argue about. That asymmetry is exactly why the panic is showing up now, ahead of any definitive verdict on whether the spending was worth it.Simon Willison did the arithmetic on himself. He pays $200 a month across his Anthropic and OpenAI consumer plans, and when he ran the [ccusage](https://github.com/ryoppippi/ccusa…
-
Bloated: how chat made you fat
> It helps to remember the time you save generating a document is not free. It is borrowed from every person who has to read it, at interest, and the longer the distribution list the worse the rate of return.The pitch for writing with a language model is that it saves you time: you describe the memo, the model produces it and 90 seconds later you have four pages (okay, maybe forty) instead of a blank document. Someone still has to read those pages though. The model did not remove that work. It just moved it downstream to your colleagues or suppliers, and on the way it produced more than any h…
-
Apple’s bicycle without a chain
Steve Jobs described the computer as a bicycle for the mind. Apple Intelligence so far is more like a bicycle with no chain. The frame is gorgeous, and the engineering is extraordinary, but you cannot get far with it.In early 2025, Xe Iaso published a [piece that landed like a brick through a window](https://xeiaso.net/blog/2025/squandered-holy-grail/) in the Apple developer community. The argument was simple and damning: Apple had built the holy grail of trusted compute with Private Cloud Compute, a genuinely unprecedented piece of security infrastructure, only to fill it with half-baked not…
