Reading between the lines
By Garrett,
There’s a lot to learn in a professional services business between the day you open your doors and the day you sell or retire or whatever it is you do next. And there are a million different angles you can take to improve the future based on the past.
Here is a line graph of my previous business over an eleven-year period. It looks like I asked my four-year-old to draw a line (or the actual path from point A to point B in a client project) but bear with me.
I can look at this graph and the dates and remember what I was doing at that time (and what was going on in the world at that time) and figure out what I did well, what I did badly and what was out of my control.
I could also slice that graph into a few growth categories or ranges, list out what had the most impact in one range and how those learnings transition into new insights for the next range. i.e. 0–$200k, $200k–$600k, $600k–$1.2m, $1.2m–$3m, etc.
In the earlier stages, shaping and packaging what makes you different, building consistency, and getting clear on your direction matter more than perfecting certain systems and processes. Over time, the systems and processes become more important, while still keeping a pulse on the others.
The point is, different principles matter at different stages and what’s critical in year one (or size one) might be irrelevant or need adjusting in year five (or size five), and vice versa.
And, sometimes you do stuff for a period and then forget about it in the next period. This exercise might help you to remember.
Overall, it’s a mix of consistency, positioning, process and making more good decisions than bad from the start that will smooth out the line and keep it moving up and to the right.
Pick 3-4 inflection points and ask yourself what you did well, what you’d change and what was simply beyond your control, and figure out how you can apply or evolve those insights to your business today.
Like this? Get email updates or grab the RSS feed.
More insights:
-
Climbing the Claude ladder: from prompting to orchestrating
Most people using Claude are stuck on the first rung of a very tall ladder. They open a chat, type a question, get an answer, and move on with their day. Which is fine, but it’s a bit like buying a full workshop and only using the tape measure. I’ve spent the better part of a y…
-
The path to an agent-first web
For three decades, the web has operated on an implicit contract between the people who build websites and the people who visit them. You design pages for human eyes and organise information for human brains, monetising attention through ads, upsells, and sticky navigation patter…
-
Generative engine optimisation: separating sound practice from snake oil
A new three-letter acronym is stalking the marketing industry. Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO) is the practice of making your content visible in AI-generated answers, such as those produced by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Claude. The term was coined in a 20…
-
Automating your marketing 01: Paid Search Ads
Google has always wanted you to believe that running search ads is simple and not as complex as it actually is. Set a budget (a generous one!), choose some keywords, and let the machine handle the rest. To be fair, the machine has become exceptionally good at certain aspects of …
-
Why AI models hallucinate
In September 2025, OpenAI published a paper that said something the AI industry already suspected but hadn’t quite articulated. The paper, “Why Language Models Hallucinate”, authored by Adam Tauman Kalai, Ofir Nachum, Santosh Vempala, and Edwin Zhang, didn’t just catalogue the p…
