Weeknotes vol. 7: Here ye here ye, Braindrop hath reached 100 commits
By Garrett,
Another week down the hatch.
As I said last week, we made big progress on the Web/Mac app design, and I wanted to get the prototype updated as soon as possible so that we could interact with the design decisions and make future desisions from there. So, I spent most of the week polishing the Web/Mac prototype. On Monday I added 25 issues to GitHub and by Friday had gotten through 23 of them.
Funny thing about software that you don’t realize until you’re building it is the complexity multiple that comes with every little thing. We’ve pulled the MVP back to the bones, and there’s still quite a bit more to work through than anticipated.
Speaking of MVP, for the time being we’re replacing thought processing with the Web Share API so that you can quickly process your thoughts into whatever application you’re already using. It’s easy to work with but it has it’s quirks:
More like, is literally always ignored by the target.
In other words, if I say title: <%= escape_javascript(thought.content) %>, they say it equals <% content_for :title, "Home" %>. If I’m missing something please tell me.
Matt made his inaugural commits to the codebase and is building a test suite to ensure everything we expect to be true is true and everything we expect to be false is false. This pushed me to make the extensive list of expected functionality (and whatever the opposite of that is) that I’ve been putting off for the last few weeks.
I also celebrated commit #100 and updated Ruby to 3.4.3
The prototype is now at a place where I’m using it as my primary thought and task tracking application, and Phil’s been able to use it to continue on with the interaction details.
Like this? Get email updates or grab the RSS feed like it’s 2008.
More from the blog
-
Another nice mess
Somewhere in your business right now, someone is assembling a picture that no single app can provide. It may be the project manager pulling hours from Harvest and budget data from the finance tool to assess whether the engagement is still viable. Maybe it's you on a Sunday, because what you need is not any one number from a system, but the pattern across three of them. The cloud gave small businesses access to the best software they had ever had, priced monthly and built for specific purposes. But twenty years of sensibly chosen apps have left the average small business with a patchwork data …
-
The state and the machine
> What little we saw of Fable and Mythos offers both cause for excitement and concern. It was widely and credibly seen as a model of a completely different caliber from those that had come before. Perhaps the risks in this instance were overstated or amplified for political ends. What is more profound is that the short time we had with the models offered a clear glimpse of a future in which a single company is making significant progress toward a superintelligence with the potential to rival or exceed the power of nation-states or even massive corporations. That juncture was never going to ar…
-
We have ways of making you pay
> The true cost of AI work is hard to measure; the value of AI work is also hard to measure, and metering changes which of those two blindnesses you notice first. It drags the cost into the light, itemised and arriving monthly, while the value stays diffuse, lagging and easy to argue about. That asymmetry is exactly why the panic is showing up now, ahead of any definitive verdict on whether the spending was worth it.Simon Willison did the arithmetic on himself. He pays $200 a month across his Anthropic and OpenAI consumer plans, and when he ran the [ccusage](https://github.com/ryoppippi/ccusa…
-
Bloated: how chat made you fat
> It helps to remember the time you save generating a document is not free. It is borrowed from every person who has to read it, at interest, and the longer the distribution list the worse the rate of return.The pitch for writing with a language model is that it saves you time: you describe the memo, the model produces it and 90 seconds later you have four pages (okay, maybe forty) instead of a blank document. Someone still has to read those pages though. The model did not remove that work. It just moved it downstream to your colleagues or suppliers, and on the way it produced more than any h…
-
Apple’s bicycle without a chain
Steve Jobs described the computer as a bicycle for the mind. Apple Intelligence so far is more like a bicycle with no chain. The frame is gorgeous, and the engineering is extraordinary, but you cannot get far with it.In early 2025, Xe Iaso published a [piece that landed like a brick through a window](https://xeiaso.net/blog/2025/squandered-holy-grail/) in the Apple developer community. The argument was simple and damning: Apple had built the holy grail of trusted compute with Private Cloud Compute, a genuinely unprecedented piece of security infrastructure, only to fill it with half-baked not…
